In the 🖥️ Base Functionality domain, both 🌊 InfoSewer and 💧 InfoSWMM offer a 🔄 Conservative Solution option (✅Y). However, the public domain advantage is a feather in 💧 InfoSWMM's cap due to its 🌐 Public domain engine (✅Y), a feature not shared by 🌊 InfoSewer (❌N). Both systems excel in 💃 Calibrating model to flow data (✅Y), with 💧 InfoSWMM going a step further by providing 📊 Calibration Data (✅Y).
In the 🖱️ IT/Database Architecture landscape, both turn away from 🤝 Multi-User Architecture (❌N). However, 💧 InfoSWMM stands tall with 💪 64 Bit Application & Multi Core Processing (✅Y) and 🚀 Remote Simulation Capability (✅Y), features 🌊 InfoSewer hasn't adopted (❌N).
In the 🌐 2D/Advanced Hydraulic Modeling arena, both shy away from 🌉 River, Bridge, and Ancillary Modeling (❌N). But, 💧 InfoSWMM shines by offering 2D Included as an Add On and 🌊 True Representation of Open Channels through HEC-RAS, unlike 🌊 InfoSewer (❌N). Yet, they both brave the storm with 🛡️ Shock Capturing capability (✅Y) for modeling high-velocity flows/steep embankments.
Additionally, 💧 InfoSWMM can migrate to 🔄 ICM SWMM, and 🌊 InfoSewer to 🔄 ICM InfoWorks. Though 🔄 ICM SWMM and 🔄 ICM InfoWorks share a common UX, 🔄 ICM InfoWorks boasts a richer feature set, offering a more feature-full experience compared to 🔄 ICM SWMM. This integration broadens user horizons, allowing for a seamless transition between platforms, enriching the user experience, and enhancing project execution.
🎗️ Feature Class | 🛠️ Feature | 🌊 InfoSewer | 💧 InfoSWMM |
---|---|---|---|
🖥️ Base Functionality | Conservative Solution as an option | Y | Y |
Public domain engine | N | Y | |
Calibrate model to flow data | Y | Y | |
Calibration Data | N | Y | |
... | ... | ... | |
🖱️ IT/Database Architecture | Multi-User Architecture | N | N |
64-Bit Application & Multi-Core Processing | N | Y | |
... | ... | ... | |
🌐 2D/Advanced Hydraulic Modeling | River, Bridge, and Ancillary Modeling | N | N |
2D Included | N | Add On | |
... | ... | ... |
No comments:
Post a Comment