In the π₯️ Base Functionality domain, both π InfoSewer and π§ InfoSWMM offer a π Conservative Solution option (✅Y). However, the public domain advantage is a feather in π§ InfoSWMM's cap due to its π Public domain engine (✅Y), a feature not shared by π InfoSewer (❌N). Both systems excel in π Calibrating model to flow data (✅Y), with π§ InfoSWMM going a step further by providing π Calibration Data (✅Y).
In the π±️ IT/Database Architecture landscape, both turn away from π€ Multi-User Architecture (❌N). However, π§ InfoSWMM stands tall with πͺ 64 Bit Application & Multi Core Processing (✅Y) and π Remote Simulation Capability (✅Y), features π InfoSewer hasn't adopted (❌N).
In the π 2D/Advanced Hydraulic Modeling arena, both shy away from π River, Bridge, and Ancillary Modeling (❌N). But, π§ InfoSWMM shines by offering 2D Included as an Add On and π True Representation of Open Channels through HEC-RAS, unlike π InfoSewer (❌N). Yet, they both brave the storm with π‘️ Shock Capturing capability (✅Y) for modeling high-velocity flows/steep embankments.
Additionally, π§ InfoSWMM can migrate to π ICM SWMM, and π InfoSewer to π ICM InfoWorks. Though π ICM SWMM and π ICM InfoWorks share a common UX, π ICM InfoWorks boasts a richer feature set, offering a more feature-full experience compared to π ICM SWMM. This integration broadens user horizons, allowing for a seamless transition between platforms, enriching the user experience, and enhancing project execution.
π️ Feature Class | π ️ Feature | π InfoSewer | π§ InfoSWMM |
---|---|---|---|
π₯️ Base Functionality | Conservative Solution as an option | Y | Y |
Public domain engine | N | Y | |
Calibrate model to flow data | Y | Y | |
Calibration Data | N | Y | |
... | ... | ... | |
π±️ IT/Database Architecture | Multi-User Architecture | N | N |
64-Bit Application & Multi-Core Processing | N | Y | |
... | ... | ... | |
π 2D/Advanced Hydraulic Modeling | River, Bridge, and Ancillary Modeling | N | N |
2D Included | N | Add On | |
... | ... | ... |