Friday, November 10, 2023

🌍🌧️ Approaches for LID Control Placement in Subcatchments

 πŸŒπŸŒ§️ Approaches for LID Control Placement in Subcatchments

Implementing Low Impact Development (LID) controls within a subcatchment can be approached in two distinct ways, each catering to different urban planning and environmental objectives:

1. Mixed LID Placement in Existing Subcatchment 🏞️🌳

  • Method: Introduce one or more LID controls into an existing subcatchment. This displaces an equivalent non-LID area.
  • Variety: Allows a mix of LIDs, each treating runoff from different non-LID areas of the subcatchment.
  • Parallel Action: LID controls act in parallel, not in series. Meaning, outflow from one LID doesn't become inflow for another.
  • Adjustments Needed: May require modifications to properties like Percent Impervious and Width to balance the area replaced by LIDs.
  • Example: Transforming 75% of a 40% impervious area to permeable pavement changes the imperviousness to around 14.3%.
  • Runoff Dynamics: LIDs like Green Roofs and Rooftop Disconnection treat only the precipitation directly falling on them, not capturing runoff from other areas.


2. Dedicated Single LID Practice in New Subcatchment 🌱🚧

  • Approach: Create a new subcatchment entirely devoted to a single LID practice.
  • Series Placement: Allows LID controls to be aligned in series and receive runoff from multiple upstream subcatchments.
  • Subcatchment Adjustments: If carved out of existing subcatchments, modifications to Percent Impervious, Width, and Area properties might be necessary.
  • Override Standard Properties: In a subcatchment fully occupied by an LID, standard surface properties are overridden by those specific to the LID.
  • Routing Outflows: Surface and drain outflows from LIDs usually go to the same outlet as the parent subcatchment. Alternatives include routing all LID outflow back to the pervious area of the parent subcatchment or directing drain outflow to a separate outlet.

πŸ”§πŸ’§ Implementation Considerations

  • Spatial Planning: Deciding which approach to use depends on the spatial and environmental context of the subcatchment.
  • Environmental Impact: Each method has different implications for water management, infiltration, and ecological impact.
  • Urban Compatibility: Consideration of the urban landscape and existing infrastructure is crucial in selecting the appropriate method.

In conclusion, these two approaches offer flexible strategies for integrating LID controls into urban landscapes, each with its unique advantages and considerations. Proper planning and execution of these strategies can significantly enhance sustainable water management and ecological resilience in urban areas. πŸ™️🌱🚰

🌿🌧️ Detailed Overview of LID Controls with Emojis

 πŸŒΏπŸŒ§️ Detailed Overview of LID Controls with Emojis

Low Impact Development (LID) Controls are innovative practices designed to manage surface runoff in an eco-friendly way. They aim to handle runoff through detention, infiltration, and evapotranspiration, much like Aquifers and Snow Packs. Here’s a detailed look at the various types of LID controls modeled in SWMM:

  1. StreetPlanter πŸŒ³πŸ›£️:

    • Nature: Depression areas with vegetation in engineered soil above a gravel drainage bed.
    • Function: Stores, infiltrates, and evaporates direct rainfall and runoff from surrounding areas.
  2. RainGarden 🌼🌧️:

    • Type: A variant of bio-retention cells, composed solely of an engineered soil layer, sans gravel bed.
    • Purpose: Simplified bio-retention for rainwater.
  3. GreenRoof 🏠🌿:

    • Design: Soil layer on a drainage mat on roofs.
    • Benefit: Manages rainfall percolation and runoff on roof structures.
  4. InfilTrench πŸ•³️πŸ’§:

    • Structure: Narrow ditches filled with gravel.
    • Role: Intercepts runoff, providing storage and time for soil infiltration.
  5. PermeablePavement πŸš—πŸŒ³:

    • Continuous System: Gravel-filled excavated areas with porous overlay.
    • Block Paver System: Impervious blocks on a gravel bed.
    • Advantage: Reduces surface runoff, promotes infiltration.
  6. Cistern πŸ›’️🌦️:

    • Utility: Containers for collecting roof runoff.
    • Usage: Stores rainwater for later use or release.
  7. Downspout 🏠🌧️:

    • Approach: Redirects roof downspouts to pervious areas instead of storm drains.
    • Effect: Encourages ground infiltration, reducing direct stormwater discharge.
  8. VegSwale 🌾🌊:

    • Formation: Vegetated, sloped channels.
    • Impact: Slows runoff conveyance, enhances soil infiltration.

Additional Features and Considerations:

  • Drain Systems Optional πŸ”„: Bio-retention cells, infiltration trenches, and permeable pavements may include drains in their gravel beds to manage excess runoff.
  • Impermeable Floors/Liners πŸš«πŸ’§: Prevent infiltration into native soil, ideal for specific site conditions.
  • Clogging and Conductivity 🚧: Infiltration trenches and permeable pavements may experience reduced conductivity over time.
  • Pollutant Removal πŸ’§πŸ§ͺ: LID units with drains can be assigned removal percentages for pollutants.
  • Runoff and Pollutant Reduction 🌍🌟: LIDs reduce both the volume of runoff and the mass load of pollutants due to decreased flow volume.

These LID controls represent a step forward in sustainable urban planning, offering a blend of ecological preservation and urban development. By implementing these systems, urban areas can significantly reduce their environmental footprint and contribute to a healthier, greener future. πŸŒ³πŸ™️🌍

πŸŒŠπŸ’» Modeling Pressurized Pipes in InfoWorks ICM: A Technical Insight by Innovyze πŸ› ️πŸ”¬

 πŸŒŠπŸ’» Modeling Pressurized Pipes in InfoWorks ICM: A Technical Insight by Innovyze πŸ› ️πŸ”¬

πŸ“ Location: Innovyze, Howbery Park, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, OX10 8BA, United Kingdom
πŸ“ž Contact: +44 (01491) 821400 | πŸ“§ support@innovyze.com
πŸ”— Website: www.innovyze.com


πŸ“œ Technical Paper - February 2013

🌟 Introduction

  • A challenge in Modeling: Correct modeling of pressurized pipes, known as forcemains or rising mains, poses significant challenges in the model-building process. πŸ—️
  • Transition Issue: The key difficulty lies in finding equations to represent the transition from free surface flow (like open channels or partially full pipes) to pressurized flow (fully full pipes). This flow can be intermittent (as in storm pipes during rainfall) or constant (as in pumped systems or siphons). πŸ’¦⚖️

πŸ•³️ Preissmann Slot Approximation

  • Representation Technique: Pipes that are typically free surface and occasionally surcharged are modeled using the Preissmann Slot approximation. πŸ“
  • Slot Functionality: This technique involves a narrow slot running the length of the pipe, allowing for the maintenance of a free surface and avoiding transition issues. 🚰

πŸŒ€ Pressurized Pipe Modeling Challenges

  • Not Suitable for Heavily Surcharged Pipes: The Preissmann slot isn't recommended for pipes that are permanently or heavily surcharged due to overprediction of flow attenuation and underprediction of headloss. 🌧️🚫
  • Solution Models: Two model options are available - ‘Pressure’ or ‘ForceMain’ - each with unique characteristics to suit different scenarios. πŸ”„

🌐 Forcemain Solution: A Detailed Example

  • Complex Arrangements: The example illustrates a complex forcemain system, traversing hills, requiring careful modeling to maintain full pipes throughout the simulation. 🏞️πŸ”§
  • Siphoning Effect: The hydraulic profile shows how part of the system acts as a siphon, which can be altered by using sealed manholes instead of break nodes to simulate air valves. πŸŒͺ️

πŸ“ˆ Result Comparisons and Good Practices

  • Flow Characteristics: Comparison of flow results in different setups (with and without air valves) reveals the impact on pump characteristics and flow attenuation. πŸ’§πŸ”
  • Best Practices: A summary of best practices includes using break nodes at key junctions, representing air valves with sealed manholes, and ensuring proper initialization. ✅πŸ“Š

πŸ“Œ General Points to Note:

  • Multiple Pumps and Forcemains: These principles are also applicable to systems with multiple pumps and forcemains. πŸ”„
  • Attention to Detail: Challenges such as positive gradient in pressure pipes and ensuring full initialization are critical for accurate modeling. 🎯
  • Headloss Types: Only ‘fixed’ or ‘none’ headloss types should be used in pressurized pipes for accurate representation. πŸ“‰

πŸ“š Conclusion

In summary, modeling pressurized pipes in InfoWorks ICM requires careful consideration of flow characteristics and pipe conditions. Innovyze provides a thoughtful approach to tackling these complexities, ensuring accurate and reliable modeling for urban water systems. πŸŒ†πŸ’§

AI Rivers of Wisdom about ICM SWMM

Here's the text "Rivers of Wisdom" formatted with one sentence per line: [Verse 1] 🌊 Beneath the ancient oak, where shadows p...